Showing posts with label Tesco. Bath Press site. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tesco. Bath Press site. Show all posts

Wednesday, 20 May 2015

Bath Press Site - Planning Application

Sarah Moore and Sharon Ball outside existing site

Tesco's have finally submitted their new planning application for the former Bath Press site on the Lower Bristol Road.  This site has been left derelict for a considerable length of time and we are keen to see it re-developed.

The application is for the demolition of existing buildings and redevelopment of the site to provide a residential-led mixed-use development comprising 244 dwellings (Use Class C3) and 1,485.2 square metres (GIA) flexible employment space (Use Class B1), basement car park, associated landscaping and access

The proposed housing is made up of:

Market Housing

1 bed flats/maisonette - 55
2 bed flats/maisonette - 104
3 bed flats/maisonette - 21
3 bed houses - 10
4+ bed houses - 20

Social Rented Housing

1 bed flats/maisonette - 5
2 bed flats/maisonette - 14
3 bed flats/maisonette - 6

Intermediate Housing

1 bed flats/maisonette - 3
2 bed flats/maisonette - 6

The remaining space would be used for offices and an underground car park for 207 vehicles and cycle storage for 301 bikes would be put in place.

The application number is 15/02162/EFUL and can be viewed here on the BANES website, comments can be submitted up to 17/06/2015, with a proposed decision date of 31/08/2015.

Sarah and Sharon would welcome residents views on the application and look forward to hearing from you.

by
Sarah Moore

Wednesday, 13 March 2013

Tesco appeal over refusal of Bath Press site.

Sharon at Bath Press site
Below are details of the appeal by Tesco over the refusal of their planning application for the Bath Press site.


Town and Country Planning Act 1990
Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) Order 2010
Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011
Site Location:    Former Bath Press Premises Lower Bristol Road Westmoreland Bath
Description of Proposal:    Mixed-use redevelopment comprising 6,300sqm of retail (Class A1), 4,580sqm of creative work space (Class B1), 2,610sqm of offices (Class B1), 220sqm of community space (class D1/D2), 10 residential houses, basement car park, landscape and access (including realignment of Brook Road)
Appeal Ref:    13/00028/RF
Application Ref:      12/01999/EFUL
Planning Inspectorate Appeal Ref:  APP/F0114/A/13/2191952
Appeal Start Date:  8 March 2013
Appellant:  Tesco Stores Limited
We are writing to inform you that an Appeal has been made to the Planning Inspectorate in respect of the above development.  The appeal is against the decision of the Local Planning Authority to refuse planning permission for the development described above.  Permission was refused for the reason(s) set out as follows:

 1 The proposed development would give rise to a potential danger to human lives by virtue of its proximity to the nearby operational gasholder site contrary to planning policies ES9 and ES13 of the adopted Bath and North East Somerset Local Plan and contrary to the advice of the Health and Safety Executive.

 2 The applicant has failed to justify trip generation, parking demand and trip distribution assumptions made in their Transport Assessment and analysis. Insufficient information has been submitted  in respect of these issues and all other modelling input data to enable the soundness of the analysis to be verified. Therefore, the applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposed development includes satisfactory provision for access from the public highway, car parking and servicing. The site is located at a critical point on the strategic highway network where the existing junction is frequently operating at capacity. The development would therefore be prejudicial to highway capacity and safety.
The proposed development is, therefore, contrary to Policies T1, T3, T5, T16, T24 and T26 of the adopted Bath and North East Somerset Local Plan, including minerals and waste policies and paragraph 32 of the NPPF and having regard to additional developments already committed in this part of Bath

 3 The proposed development is not in accordance with the requirements of the sequential approach to development contrary to the Bath and North East Somerset adopted Local Plan Policy S4, Joint Replacement Structure Plan Policy 40, Regional Planning Guidance Policy EC6 and paragraphs 24 and 27 of the NPPF. The development would as a result generate unsustainable travel patterns contrary to paragraph 30 and 32 of the NPPF and be harmful to the Council's retail strategy.

 4 The proposed development would give rise to an unacceptable and significant adverse  impact on the vitality and viability of the Moorland Road District Shopping Centre contrary to Policies S1 and S4, of the adopted Bath and North East Somerset Local Plan, Joint Replacement Structure Plan Policies 40 and 41 and Regional Planning Guidance Policy EC6 and paragraph 27 of the NPPF.


It has been agreed that the appeal should be dealt with at an Inquiry and you will be notified of the date of the Inquiry in due course.

Details of the appeal are available for inspection on planning pages of the Councils website www.bathnes.gov.uk.  If you do not have access to the internet, you can use the self-service computers at all Council Connect Offices.  They are available at The One Stop Shop, 3-4 Manvers Street in Bath, Riverside in Keynsham and The Hollies in Midsomer Norton.

Electronic booklets entitled 'Guide to Taking Part in Planning Appeals' are also available for download on the Council’s website.  Alternatively, you can access these documents via the Planning Inspectorate website at www.planningportal.gov.uk/pcs.  Should you not have access to the internet you can obtain these booklets from any of the Council Connect Offices as listed above or by telephone on 01225 394041.

Any comments made in respect of the original application for development will be forwarded to the Planning Inspectorate, and taken into account by the Inspector deciding the appeal.

The Planning Inspectorate has introduced an online appeals service which you can view details of the appeal and use to make further comments on this appeal. You can find the service through the Appeals area of the Planning Portal – see www.planningportal.gov.uk/pcs. The Inspectorate may publish details of your comments, on the internet (on the Appeals area of the Planning Portal). Your comments may include your name, address, email address or phone number, Please ensure that you only provide information, including personal information belonging to you that you are happy will be made available to others in this way. If you supply information belonging to a third party please ensure you have their permission to do so. More detailed information about data protection and privacy matters is available on the Planning Portal.  Alternatively, you can also comment in writing to The Planning Inspectorate, 3/02 Kite Wing, Temple Quay House, 2 The Square, Bristol, BS1 6PN (please provide 3 copies) quoting the Inspectorate’s Appeal Reference: APP/F0114/A/13/2191952.

The Planning Inspectorate must receive representations by the 19 April 2013 or they will not normally be seen by the Inspector and will be returned.

Appeals and Enforcement Team
Planning Services

Friday, 18 January 2013

Tesco application Lwr Bristol Road

Cllr Sharon Ball at Bath Press site
The planning application by Tesco to build a new store on the Lwr Bristol Road was turned down by the Councils development control committee on Wednesday 16th January on a 9/4 vote.

The Community surrounding the site are split on their opinion of the proposals by Tesco, In this light we are working to ensure that the feelings of the community are reflected and not just our own.

There are still Major hurdles and problems with this application and we have made it very clear that the present application is not acceptable as there are still Highway, traffic volumes and disbursement issues that have to be addressed.

Other issues that we have brought to the attention of planners and Tesco are the need to ensure that Gulls are unable to nest on their roof space and also the affects on neighbouring shopping centres.

The Gas Tower on Western Riverside is still an obstacle although we realise that Tesco have made an attempt to resolve this issue. 

Only time will tell if Tesco appeal the decision to refuse their application but we are hopeful that they will have listened to ours views as well as those of the community and if they do reapply that they take these views on board.

By Councillor Sharon Ball

Friday, 27 July 2012

Tesco Planning application

I have made comments on the current Tesco planning application for the Bath Press site.

I have raised my comments as objections as I feel that Tesco have not learnt the lessons from their previous two applications for this site and have virtually just reiterated some of the errors made in the first two applications.

Further drawings and amendments have been submitted by Tesco but I still feel that these do not compensate for some of the issues that I an other residents still have over this proposed development.

The additional papers can be viewed @ http://idox.bathnes.gov.uk/WAM/showCaseFile.do?appNumber=12/01999/EFUL

my comments

 This application is no different to previous ones in many aspects and ill only concentrate on areas that I have not previously covered.

1) The over domination of traffic on a junction on Brook Rd is overbearing and will not be able to cope with the release of cars from the underground car park.

2) The affects on pollution and increased amount of traffic on the Lower Bristol Road and at Brook Road have not been resolved.

3) The over dominance of the supermarket on this site is against council polices and exceeds the available shopping needs requirements.

4) No work has been carried out to accurately asses the affects that the store would have on the neighbouring Moorland Road.

5) The Health & Safety executive have ruled out development on this site whilst the gas tower remains.

6) There seems to be little work carried out to mitigate the pigeon population that would nest on the roofs.

By Cllr Sharon Ball